Tag Archives: Terror Watch List

John Kachelman, Jr.-#Black Lives Matter on Military Installations? An Open Letter to Pres. Donald J. Trump 4 (1)

The following is a letter having already been sent to the office of the president by John Kachelman, Jr.

16 July 2020

President Donald J. Trump:

I am very concerned about a situation that was highlighted in a memo sent from the USAF/Maxwell AFB on 15 July 2020 giving support to Black Lives Matter Global Network. This memo stated in part: The OSC concluded that “BLM is a ‘hot-button’ issue and both politically and culturally salient. But BLM terminology is use-based, not a campaign slogan. Therefore, using BLM terminology, without more, is not political activity. The Black Lives Matter Global Network (BLMGN) does not meet any of the criteria classification as a partisan political group. Therefore, BLMGN is not a partisan political group, and employees are not prohibited from wearing or displaying the BLMGN paraphernalia in the workplace.”

BLMGN poses grave and present danger not only to the security of the USA but to foreign nations. Its intent is to incite anarchy. Recent media reports their actions in London. You have resources that an validate their terroristic threatening much better.

BLM/BLMGN is a group show foundations are based upon the terror advocated by Marx and modernized by Alinsky. Its entire objective is to dominate. Its leaders have racist rants. The mission is to accomplish its objective of “transformation” of America or “burn it down.”

And THIS is the organization the USAF has now embraced with a protective memo. HOW can this be permitted on your watch?

On another USAFB an airman proudly displayed the “thin blue line” emblem. The base command told him that was inappropriate and instructed to remove it.

So, on the one hand your administration applauds and embraces the “thin blue line” that maintains civility BUT then those under your command disrespect those heroes and stifle visible support. On one hand your administration charges BLM/BLMGN with criminal sedition BUT those under your command issue orders that this radical terror group is to be given privilege. In your administration those upholding civility are silenced while those clamoring for anarchy are insulated.

Exactly WHERE do you, your administration and those military serving under your command stand on this situation?

Note: John Kachelman, Jr. is a Christian patriot, preacher, and missionary for Jesus Christ to foreign countries. He lives in Montgomery, AL.

Who’s Minding the List? 0 (0)

Who’s Minding the List?

by Bill Lockwood

Last week the Congressional Democrats were in full left-wing 1960’s hippie-socialist mode as they lawlessly staged a sit-down on the floor of Congress. Like the radicals of the old Kent State that they are, only now with suits and skirts, they chanted their pro-communist anti-gun slogans as they waved homemade signs. After Orlando, these radicals think to get their foot in the door on what the left has always been after—Gun Control. Remove the ability of the citizenry to defend itself.

“Moderate” (read “weak”) Republicans such as John Cornyn (R-TX) tried to mollify the Democratic rascals by proposing that mandatory three-day investigations be conducted by the Federal Government when someone on the “terror watch list” tries to buy a gun. His proposal would have allowed the Attorney General to block purchase of firearms while investigations were conducted. His proposal failed.

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) went further. Her proposal would authorize the Attorney General to block any person from purchasing a firearm if there was a reasonable belief that the weapon might be used in terroristic attacks. Apparently, Loretta Lynch’s speech about winning over terrorists with “love” did not stick with Feinstein.

Fortunately, these measures failed to move forward. The Second Amendment is a PROHIBITION against the Federal Government from entering into this territory. The right of “the people” shall not be infringed to “keep and bear arms” is a codified right precisely to defend ourselves from an over-reaching government. Usurpation and intervention by the federal government were the two most prominent dangers to the drafters of the Second Amendment. This is why the “Bill of Rights” opens with the law, “Congress shall make NO LAW…”

Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist #84 that since our government is only a “limited government” with only a few specified powers it would have absolutely NO authority to regulate a citizen’s freedom of speech, religion, etc. Neither is there any federal authority to register or confiscate firearms or to block sales to those whom it considers possible “terrorists.”

Now enters the “Terror Watch List.” As baffling as it is, it seems the Republican Senators and Congressmen who are intent on mollifying the thuggery of the Democrats have forgotten who writes this list! When Obama became president and Janet Napolitano was the Secretary of Homeland Security, those who were singled out for government “monitoring” were: returning “military veterans” who were “facing significant challenges” as they sought to “reintegrate” into society. This situation, per Napolitano and Obama, “could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.”

Obama’s “Terror Watch List” also included “right-wing extremists.” In Obama’s Lexicon that includes those who study the Constitution or who are Tea-Partiers, or members of such organizations as the John Birch Society. Never mind that there are currently Islamic Jihadi Terroristic Training Camps in America—for these we must spread the banquet table. But we must watch those Constitutionalists!

I will put these proposals by Cornyn and Feinstein in simple syllogistic form.
•    The the Federal Government disallows those on the terror watch list access to firearms.
•    Those on terror watch list (per DHS) include “right-wing extremists” and “returning veterans.”
•    Thus, the Federal Government disallows returning vets and right-wingers guns.

For an encapsulated view of those bold hypocrites who are minding the Terror Watch List, consider also the recent interview that leftist Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY) granted to a reporter on Gun Control.

The Reporter asks Charlie: “Why should, say, the uber-wealthy have that protection [ability to carry firearms] but individuals who are law-abiding citizens in your district should not?”

Charlie: “Well, law-abiding citizens just shouldn’t have to carry a gun. You know that, so you’re not going to push me in that direction.”

Reporter: “But you’re protected by guns all over the place here in the Capitol.”

Charlie: (Laughing) “Well, that’s a little different. I think we deserve—I think we need to be protected down here.”

That attitude speaks for itself. Yes, it does make a difference who is minding the “Terror Watch List.”

Back to Homepage